Sunday, April 10, 2011

The Importance of HR Communication in the Organization


The most important thing that I have taken from this class is the importance of communication between the Human Resource department and the organization.  The functions of the Human Resources department are intertwined in everything that takes place in the organization. 

When initially hired, HR provides the introduction to the organization in the new employee orientation.  What happens then can set the tone for the new employees work experience.  Equally as important is the day to day communication that comes from HR and Sr. Management, not only communicating the vision of the organization but also backing it up in their day to day activities.  And this communication is even more important during tough economic times when the threat of downsizing is looming. 

The communication must also be well thought out.  For instance, in my company, our CEO wrote a blog about becoming a leaner organization.  Immediately, employees interpreted, or perhaps misinterpreted that to mean that the company was going to be downsizing.  While that was not out of the question, I believe the message spoke more to becoming a more efficient organization.  What the organization failed to realize is that many people did not understand the term “lean” and how that communication would impact employee perception.  The CEO quickly had to follow up with more blogs explaining what he meant but unfortunately, the damage was done.

The Human Resources department also performs an important role in the exit of employees from the organization.  If the organization faces layoffs, the communication to both employees impacted by the layoffs as well as the remaining employees must be handled carefully.  If good employees must be laid off, the HR department must be careful not to alienate the employee should they be in the position to rehire them.  For employees that remain, HR must instill a sense of security that will exist because of the layoffs.   

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Public Sector Unionization


The article discusses the decline of unions in the private sector and the rise of unions in the public sector. The decline in unions for the private sector is due, in part, to the loss of industrial and manufacturing jobs and to the successful work of HR professionals in improving employee relations.  In addition, laws and regulations are in place now to protect workers and taking the place of traditional union protections.

Public sector unions are increasing for a variety of reasons.  Some of these reasons include the emergence of laws protecting the public sector. In the 1950’s, on a few public sector employees were organized.  States did not permit public sector collective bargaining, public sector strikes nor were public sector employees allowed to organize.

Another reason for the growth of public sector unions is the ability to influence employers through the political process. The article cites an example of the approval of billions of dollars of pension benefits for government workers after lobbying and campaign contributions from politically connected unions.

Public sector unions, in particular, at the state/local levels, seem to organize like craft unions rather than the traditional industrial union model in the private sector. Unions of teachers, public safety officers, firefighters, sanitation workers, transit workers have grown as these areas of public sector services have grown.
Why is this important to us?  We should be concerned about the continuing growth in public sector employment and unionization, about the rising costs associated with the public sector workforce, and the expectations for quality and cost effective services.

The article poses the following, “A question that needs to be answered in the labor/management debate is whether treating employees as costs to be minimized would lead to lower service quality and productivity, or whether building a positive workplace culture and encouraging employee participation in problem solving might lead to higher service quality and improvements in productivity.”

The article goes on to suggest the following three recommendations for improving employee/employer relations. 1) Adopt a Human Resource Management Perspective, 2) Introduction performance based evaluation and compensation and, 3) Negotiate a psychological contract.

To obtain the full article in PDF format, please contact me.